Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-4750: Add Rationale section about "minimal" function type #9382

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chfast
Copy link
Member

@chfast chfast commented Feb 19, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-stagnant This EIP is Stagnant t-core labels Feb 19, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Feb 19, 2025

File EIPS/eip-4750.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@chfast chfast marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 10:21
@chfast chfast requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner February 20, 2025 10:21
@@ -133,6 +133,17 @@ Alternative logic for `RETF` in the top frame could be to allow it during code v

This has been superseded with the validation rule of top frame (0th code section) being non-returning (non-returning sections introduced in a separate EIP), because validating non-returning status of functions is valuable by itself for other reasons. Therefore all considerations of runtime behavior of `RETF` in the top frame were obsoleted.

### "Minimal" function type

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you don't want to convert this EIP from stagnant to draft or something?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do want.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should go back to Review, but I'm also doing it in #9386

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-update Modifies an existing proposal e-review Waiting on editor to review s-stagnant This EIP is Stagnant t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants