Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: match fcontext of microshift temp volumes #4429

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maage
Copy link

@maage maage commented Jan 18, 2025

Which issue(s) this PR addresses:

Closes #4428

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dhensel-rh and ggiguash January 18, 2025 17:54
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: maage
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jogeo for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Hi @maage. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

/label ok-to-test

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2025

@pacevedom: The label(s) /label ok-to-test cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @copejon

@pmtk
Copy link
Member

pmtk commented Feb 7, 2025

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 7, 2025
@pmtk
Copy link
Member

pmtk commented Feb 10, 2025

/test ?

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2025

@pmtk: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-footprint-and-performance
/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
/test images
/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus
/test ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus
/test test-rpm
/test test-unit
/test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test security
/test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-rpm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pmtk
Copy link
Member

pmtk commented Feb 10, 2025

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2025

@maage: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Feb 13, 2025

I would like to give @maage a chance to respond to #4428 (comment).

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
4 participants